Standard of Education

‍The Registration Requirement

Under Chapter 3: Standard of Education of the Guide to the registration standards and other requirements for non-government schools effective 1 January 2024, the Director General must be satisfied that your proposed school will provide a standard of education that fully satisfies the statutory requirements of the School Education Act 1999 (WA) and aligns flawlessly with the School Curriculum and Standards Authority Act 2010 (WA) (SCSA). Your proposed school's governing body and executive leadership team hold absolute operational accountability for ensuring that prospective curriculum delivery, student assessment, progress reporting, and academic integrity metrics are planned with the highest levels of equity, transparency, and professional consistency.

To satisfy this standard, your proposed school must demonstrate a highly structured, multi layered academic framework before opening. This ecosystem must outline clear parameters for tracking future student achievement, guarantee procedural fairness during assessment disputes, and enforce explicit codes of conduct when learning transitions into digital or alternative environments. To meet the Department's basic rules, this initial education framework must be fully submitted at least six months before the school is proposed to commence.

💡 Expert Compliance Note: The Department of Education uses a highly technical approach when evaluating educational delivery plans during initial registration reviews. For a brand new school entity, case managers cannot look at a history of student grades, past report cards, or populated learning portfolios. Instead, they will thoroughly examine your proposed assessment handbooks, blank mark book templates, draft report layouts, and prospective curriculum maps. Gaps in your academic integrity procedures, an inability to outline how you will manage future assessment appeals, or a failure to maintain strict instructional boundaries will trigger an immediate compliance flag during your pre-operational review. The templates in our bundle are built from the ground up to stop these issues before they start.

‍Official References

The application form and guide are available for download via the links below.

‍ 👉 Application for registration document.

‍ 👉 Guide to the registration standards and other requirements for non-government schools effective 1 January 2024‍ ‍

Your Downloadable Template Bundle

‍Your membership includes full access to our Standard of Education Templates Bundle. This all in one ZIP file contains every document, policy, and register required to build a compliant framework.

👉 Download Standard of Education Templates Bundle ZIP File

‍📌 Please Note: Not all of these templates will suit your school, but they give you a good range to get through registration.

‍Inside your download, you will find:

  • Assessment, Reporting, and Academic Integrity

    Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Agreement

    Assessment and Reporting Policy and Procedures

    Assessment Appeal Form

    Homework Policy

    Secondary Awards Policy – Student Formal Awards and Honours

  • Alternative Learning Delivery and Engagement

    Attendance Policy and Procedure

    Code of Conduct Remote Online Learning Policy

    Remote Online Teaching and Learning Policy

Internal Proposed Evidence

Recommended Checklist for Part B Submission: To help build out your submission folder for Part B of the Application for initial registration, we recommend gathering these key internal files from your school records. Please note that while these specific documents are recommended to help evidence your compliance, this is a practical guide rather than an exhaustive checklist.

  • Proposed Assessment and Reporting Policy: Your finalised, comprehensive school policy outlining your planned grading scales, tracking mechanisms, and promotional guidelines.

  • Blank Master Student Assessment Register Template: A blank copy or software blueprint of your proposed central tracking database, proving it features separate fields to log student marks, formal grades, and SCSA syllabus milestones.

  • Blank Assessment Appeal Forms and Checklists: Pro-forma academic dispute sheets designed to ensure future grading disagreements are reviewed with full procedural fairness.

  • Blank Academic Integrity Compact Layouts: Master copies of your proposed Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Agreements, ready to be distributed to future secondary cohorts during onboarding.

  • Pro-Forma Academic Progress Report Layouts: Mock up designs or sample templates of your future end of semester formal learning briefs, proving compliant alignment with SCSA reporting standards.

  • Blank Individual Education Plan (IEP) Templates: Pro-forma learning support profiles designed to map curriculum adjustments and accommodate diverse learning needs.

  • Proposed Homework Grid Templates and Review Schedules: Draft planning layouts or guidelines proving that the volume and frequency of out of class tasks will align strictly with developmental thresholds.

  • Proposed Remote Learning Intake Guidelines: Draft administrative procedures showing that any future learners accessing online courses will be vetted against authorised, legally compliant WA eligibility categories.

  • Proposed Staff Digital Learning Induction Checklists: Blank professional learning logs or briefing checklists designed to ensure teaching staff review and sign off on strict instructional boundaries during onboarding.

Compliance Tips & Hidden Requirements

School registration reviews in WA have a few unique, specific traps that catch boards out. Make sure your team knows these hidden rules:

  • The Core SCSA Alignment Threshold (Pages 13–14): Your academic frameworks cannot operate independently of state directives. Under the "Standard of Education" section of the Guide, a non-government school must prove that its programmes are strictly aligned with the Western Australian Curriculum and Assessment Outline. Case managers will scrutinise your proposed Assessment and Reporting Policy and Procedures to verify that your planned marking systems, reporting intervals, and structural grading criteria translate perfectly to the School Curriculum and Standards Authority (SCSA) guidelines.

  • The Documented Student Progress Mandate (Page 14): Simply planning to deliver a lesson is not enough to evidence a satisfactory standard of education. The Guide specifies that a school must have robust processes to actively plan for, monitor, and achieve improvements in student learning. Case managers will trace your blank mark book templates and tracking forms to verify that your system is equipped to flag and support underachieving cohorts early.

  • The Assessment Challenge and Procedural Fairness Imperative (Pages 14–15): Your academic dispute paths will trigger an immediate compliance failure if they lack transparency. The "Standard of Education" provisions require that all grading, tracking, and promotional systems operate with a high degree of procedural fairness. Your procedures must explicitly outline an independent internal pathway utilising a blank Assessment Appeal Form that gives future secondary students a formal mechanism to have their academic disputes objectively reviewed before outcomes are permanently registered.

  • The Work Authentication and Plagiarism Safeguard (Page 15): With the rapid rise of digital generation tools, case managers look closely at independent student work validation. To satisfy the standard, your school must show that it implements active monitoring frameworks to ensure the integrity of its student data. Your workflows must demonstrate that senior cohorts will sign the Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Agreement, and that teachers follow standardised validation protocols to ensure student achievement metrics are completely accurate.

  • The Alternative Delivery Track Eligibility Gate (Standard 14 / Standard of Education Intersect): If your proposed school offers hybrid, virtual, or remote instruction, you must bridge the gap between curriculum delivery parameters and educational standards. Under Standard 14, remote delivery is highly restricted to specific categories like diagnosed illness, elite performance commitments, or geographic isolation. Your Remote Online Teaching and Learning Policy must demonstrate that these alternative pathways are structurally managed to provide the exact same educational standard and teacher interaction as face to face classes.

  • The Cyber Safety and Digital Conduct Supervision Line (Standard 10 / Standard of Education Intersect): Moving curriculum instruction onto digital channels introduces significant student safety and boundary exposures handled under Standard 10 child abuse prevention. Your school's virtual learning frameworks must feature an explicit Code of Conduct Remote Online Learning Policy that forbids unmonitored digital chats, requires recorded video learning blocks, and uses school sanctioned platforms to ensure teacher student digital interactions are completely transparent and safe.

  • The Academic Retention and Attendance Interlock (Standard 6 / Standard of Education Intersect): Your prospective daily attendance tracking configurations and your academic progress reviews must be designed to tell an identical story. Case managers will check that your Attendance Policy and Procedure is built to instantly trigger targeted learning interventions if a student drops below mandatory engagement thresholds, preventing hidden educational disengagement.

House Operational Risk Tips (Not Explicitly in the Guide)

  • Mask Technical Database Fields and Keys: When saving your proposed software blueprints, database configuration maps, or sample grading spreadsheets to your Part B evidence folder, maintain a strict privacy boundary. All system keys, database rows, or mock student data indicators must be completely blocked out or replaced with standard placeholders like [ID Number Redacted] to satisfy strict administrative data protection expectations.

  • Remove Personal Names from Educational Plans: Ensure your draft individualised education plans, special consideration forms, and sample appeal templates utilise entirely neutral tags like Student A or Case Profile B instead of real personal names before saving copies to the compliance folder.

  • Enforce Secure Document Version Controls: Lock cell editing configurations or apply secure password encryption to your central mark book database templates and assessment appeal forms on your shared drive. This stops casual updates from accidentally altering your board approved grading parameters before they are evaluated by your case manager.

Compliance Quick Check

Before you finish, double check that your school leadership has completed and marked off these specific items required on the official initial application form:

  • Does your proposed school assessment framework feature a distinct, independent appeal pathway designed for secondary students and parents?

  • Are your pro-forma student progress report layouts fully designed to translate perfectly into standard SCSA grading outlines?

  • Can you prove through your software configuration plans that your central student tracking register is ready to monitor syllabus achievements chronologically?

  • Is your prospective attendance framework directly synchronised with your alternative learning protocols to instantly flag a student who stops engaging with coursework?

📌 Now don’t forget to save your evidence in your created folder in your school's shared drive (Google Drive or OneDrive).

Back to Main